Acceptable Accuracy Podcast
AK-47 Radio Show
American Crossfire
AR-15 Podcast
Civilian Medical Podcast
CloverTac Podcast
For The Love Of Guns
God and Guns
Gun & Gear Review
Gun Club Radio
Handgun Radio
Hunters HD Gold Behind the Lens
Let's Go Hunt
Live Fire Media Show
MacBroz Show
Master of None
Misfits Media
Pew Time
PopCulture 223 Podcast
Precision Rifle Builder Podcast By Straight Jacket Armory
Prepping 2.0
Reloading Podcast
Rimfire Radio Show
State of The Second
Student of the Gun
Talking Lead
The Gun Collective Podcast
The Live Laugh Larp Podcast
The PGM Podcast
This Week in Guns
We Like Shooting
Who Moved My Freedom Podcast
ZERT Coffee & Chaos
This show is brought to you by Foxtrot Mike!
This episode of We Like Shooting is brought to you by:
SB Tactical is adding another entry to its A-Series lineup with the SBA6, a collaboration with New Hampshire-based Die Free Co designed to expand the minimalist platform that made the SBA3 an industry standard.The SBA6 accepts MIL-SPEC carbine receiver extensions and ships now in black, with Flat Dark Earth and Olive Drab Green following later this year.The design direction is deliberate.Where the SBA3 prioritizes compact dimensions and reduced weight, the SBA6 builds out the platform with a full rubber arm cuff and improved ergonomics.
Introducing the Saraid Top Notch — the first vertical charging handle for the AR-15 platform. By relocating the handle to the top, it eliminates side protrusions that cause gear snags, interfere with forward assists, or complicate manipulations near optics and slings.
DopeSpin
An Echelon, but More Affordable?Springfield Armory Unveils the NEW Echelon AlphaThe Springfield Armory Echelon is the pistol of choice for a lot of shooters because of its wide package of accoutrements and modern features.The only gripe that some shooters raise is that the more tricked out variations might be too expensive for their budget.
This tool is in response to a recent request from @TheNewNewDeal regarding best practices such as suppressor expansion chamber length and others. T…
Play the best Price Is Right-style GunBroker game on the internet.
A live cast ranking segment for anything and everything in the gun world, powered by questionable certainty, strong opinions, and audience voting.
No vote in Congress. No new statute. Just an agency ruling that turned specific 12-gauge shotguns into the same legal category as grenades.
The targets were the Striker-12, the Street Sweeper, and the USAS-12. The Striker and Street Sweeper used revolving cylinders. The USAS-12 was a semi-auto, magazine-fed shotgun. They all fired ordinary 12-gauge shells, the same kind of ammunition people put through hunting pumps all over the country.
The legal hook was buried in the National Firearms Act, specifically 26 U.S.C. § 5845(f). That section says a weapon with a bore over one-half inch can be treated as a destructive device unless the government decides it is “generally recognized as particularly suitable for sporting purposes.”
A 12-gauge shotgun has a bore of about .73 inches.
So every 12-gauge in America avoids the NFA only because ATF treats it as sporting enough. That is the trapdoor.
In 1994, during the Clinton administration, ATF issued Rulings 94-1 and 94-2. The agency said these shotguns had no recognized sporting purpose, pointing to their weight, capacity, and military-style features. Once ATF withdrew that exemption, the guns became destructive devices.
The pattern was simple:
Start with a broad statute and an elastic test like “sporting purposes.”
Use subjective factors, including appearance, to pull back prior approval.
Reclassify the guns by agency ruling.
Open a short amnesty period for tax-free registration.
Turn missed paperwork into felony exposure.
Confirmed fact: ATF used the sporting purposes clause to reclassify these firearms and require NFA registration without Congress passing a new law.
What is less clear is how many legacy owners actually got notice before the amnesty window closed. But the legal threat was real, and the policy result stuck. These shotguns became radioactive to own, transfer, or inherit.
2. WHY IT MATTERS
This was a working model for regulatory creep.
The 1994 reclassification showed that an agency could use definitions to change the legal status of firearms after people already owned them. The “sporting purposes” test has nothing to do with the Second Amendment. It is not a rights test. It is a permission test.
It asks whether unelected officials think your firearm looks respectable enough for duck hunting or trap shooting.
That mechanism is still sitting in federal law. The statute effectively says a 12-gauge is a destructive device unless ATF says otherwise. Your legal status depends on an agency opinion that can change later.
That should sound familiar.
The Street Sweeper ruling is the same kind of move ATF has used in fights over pistol braces, bump stocks, forced-reset triggers, and frame-or-receiver definitions. Pick an unpopular target. Reinterpret the category. Give owners a narrow compliance path. Then use the new classification to turn ordinary possession into felony risk.
Once the line between a legal shotgun and an NFA item depends on politics instead of a clear rule, nobody can plan around it. Builders, FFLs, collectors, and regular owners start backing away from anything unusual because the agency might change its mind after the fact.
That is the damage. Not just what happened to three shotguns. The bigger problem is that the federal government proved it could move the line later.
3. THE 2A ANGLE
Under Bruen, the government has to justify firearm restrictions by pointing to this country’s text, history, and tradition.
There is no founding-era tradition of the executive branch reclassifying privately owned firearms into an explosives-style category because they lacked recreational value.
Text: The Second Amendment protects the right to keep and bear arms. It does not say “arms suitable for sporting purposes.”
History: In the founding era, arms commonly possessed by the people were lawful to own. There was no federal licensing scheme where a Washington office could retroactively criminalize arms already in private hands.
Tradition: The sporting purposes test comes from pre-Heller thinking. Heller recognized self-defense, not hunting, as the core lawful purpose protected by the Second Amendment.
ATF penalized these shotguns for martial features and capacity. Those are not side issues. Those are exactly the traits that make arms relevant to the Second Amendment in the first place.
You do not have to like the Street Sweeper. You do not have to want a USAS-12.
The point is what the ruling normalized: category-jumping by agency decision. If a sporting purposes test can turn a 12-gauge shotgun into a destructive device, the same logic can be aimed at defensive rifles, accessories, or whatever the next politically convenient target happens to be.
Your rights should not depend on an agency waking up in a different mood.
Designed specifically for the Nightalliance 2011 Maxxing frames. There are two styles to choose from and six different optic mounting patterns. Each …
Don’t like the standard Jennings J22? Well here’s his neglected brother, the Sedco SP22. A knockoff of the already trash J22. NOT FOR DISTRIBUTION O…
*Bayonet Lug Attached Picatinny Rail for AKs* What it says on the tin. This little picatinny nugget slides onto your AK’s bayonet lug and tightens …
NYTimes reporter claims the ‘right to kill’ is growing amid gun laws and self-defense debates.
A Virginia judge will keep the state’s assault weapons ban on hold pending Supreme Court review.
– **Bullet 2: Legal/Political Impact:** The ruling creates legal limbo for the law (passed 2026, signed by Gov. Spanberger), with Attorney General Jay Jones criticizing the statewide scope as exceeding precedent and vowing to defend it; Virginia Supreme Court declined to consolidate cases; proceedings paused for SCOTUS guidance on analogous Second Amendment challenges in other states, highlighting tensions between state gun control efforts and post-Bruen scrutiny.[[3]](https://www.vpm.org/generalassembly/2026-07-30/awb-ar15-gun-ban-scotus-jones-pickett-davis-nra-campbell)
– **Bullet 3: The Bottom Line:** Virginia’s assault weapons and large-capacity magazine sales ban remains blocked statewide pending further litigation and U.S. Supreme Court review, allowing continued legal sales of affected firearms and magazines in the Commonwealth at least through late 2026.[[1]](https://www.thetruthaboutguns.com/virginia-assault-weapons-ban-injunction/)
Virginia Gov. Abigail Spanberger (D) announced that her administration has restored voting rights to more than 66,000 felons in Virginia.
Colorado’s new permit-to-purchase law enforces stricter gun buying rules and training requirements.
House Democrats oppose ATF’s rule allowing non-over-the-counter gun sales, citing trafficking risks.
Before we let you go –
We’d love if you supported the show, join Agency 171 at agency171.com. Lot’s of prizes, rewards and kick ass swag.
No matter how tough your battle is today, we want you here fight with us tomorrow. Don’t struggle in silence, you can contact the suicide prevention line by dialing 988 from your phone.
Remember – Always prefer Dangerous Freedom over peaceful slavery. We’ll see you next time!

DON’T LET BIG TECH DECIDE
Make sure we can still reach you. Join our email list for the stories, updates, deals, and giveaways the algorithm may never show you.
We’ll make sure you don’t miss what comes next.