Acceptable Accuracy Podcast
AK-47 Radio Show
American Crossfire
AR-15 Podcast
Civilian Medical Podcast
CloverTac Podcast
For The Love Of Guns
God and Guns
Gun & Gear Review
Gun Club Radio
Handgun Radio
Hunters HD Gold Behind the Lens
Let's Go Hunt
Live Fire Media Show
MacBroz Show
Master of None
Misfits Media
Pew Time
PopCulture 223 Podcast
Precision Rifle Builder Podcast By Straight Jacket Armory
Prepping 2.0
Reloading Podcast
Rimfire Radio Show
State of The Second
Student of the Gun
Talking Lead
The Gun Collective Podcast
The Live Laugh Larp Podcast
The PGM Podcast
This Week in Guns
We Like Shooting
Who Moved My Freedom Podcast
ZERT Coffee & Chaos
Coming back to you with for the 105th episode of weaponized chromosomal aberrations:
Intro: Dave or Sam
Vince, new and improved
Dave, Christmas concert survivor
Mike, who’s doing the best he can… but should try harder
Sam, on my way to drill you mom’s well and hookup her septic
On Target:
Feral horse nonsense in the US. Let us eat the damn ponies already.
Other verboten species!
Key Topics Covered:
Current Legal Status:
Wild Free-Roaming Horses and Burros Act of 1971: Thanks, Nixon.
Justifications for the Act:
Senator Henry “Scoop” Jackson (D-WA) sponsored the bill, emphasizing the need to preserve these animals as part of America’s natural and cultural heritage.
As a conservation-minded legislator, Senator Jackson believed that federal action was needed to address the increasing threats to wild horse populations. He argued that their disappearance would be a loss to the nation’s cultural and natural heritage. Jackson also emphasized that public lands needed to be managed in a balanced way, and protecting wild horses was a key part of that mission.
1. Feral Horse Populations in the U.S.
2. The Overpopulation Problem
3. Financial Costs of Current Management
4. Could Hunting Be a Solution?
5. The Ethical and Cultural Debate
Wrap up:
Legislation intended to promote conservation, such as the Wild Free-Roaming Horses and Burros Act of 1971, often achieves its initial goals but can lead to unintended consequences when its rigid application doesn’t account for changing circumstances. While the Act successfully protected wild horses from exploitation and inhumane treatment, its lack of provisions for sustainable population control has resulted in overpopulation, habitat degradation, and increased competition with other wildlife and livestock. The law’s emphasis on protection without flexibility has created a situation where non-lethal management methods, like fertility control, are needed but aren’t always sufficient to prevent long-term ecological damage. This highlights the challenge of balancing immediate conservation goals with the need for adaptive, ongoing management that can address evolving environmental and population dynamics.

DON’T LET BIG TECH DECIDE
Make sure we can still reach you. Join our email list for the stories, updates, deals, and giveaways the algorithm may never show you.
We’ll make sure you don’t miss what comes next.